Home

Products

Solutions

Support

Contact Us

About Us

Philosophy
History
Clients
Partners
Resources
News
Newsletters
January 2006 -
February 2006 -
March 2006 -
April 2006 -
May 2006 -
June 2006 -
July 2006 -
August 2006 -
September 2006 -
October 2006 -
November 2006 -
December 2006 -
January 2007 -
February 2007 -
March 2007 -
April 2007 -
May 2007 -
June 2007 -
July 2007 -
August 2007 -
September 2007 -
October 2007 -
November 2007 -
December 2007 -
Subscribe -

Event Calendar
Careers
Privacy Policy

About Us

 

 

<- BACK to Newsletters Home

TiPS Newsletter - August 2006


White Paper:
Effective Shift Handover is No Accident - Ian Nimmo


A successful handover between shifts heavily depends on the organizational skills of management and the effective use of the communication tools available. On numerous occasions, poor handovers between shifts have been responsible for accidents. A prominent example is the Texas City fire involving BP’s isomerization column on March 24, 2005. The nightshift filled the column. The dayshift continued to fill the column; it flooded, and eventually led to an accident killing 15 people.

This white paper explores the tools used to effectively communicate shift handover information and how they can be used to create an effective handover.

Read the entire white paper (146k PDF)

Feedback Forum:
Alarm Management as Operations Responsibility


The objective of alarm management is to improve overall plant performance by improving the information available to operations. Operations is the ultimate "user" of alarms and other control room information. Therefore, Operations has the most stake in alarm management and is uniquely positioned to oversee the process of improving the alarm system.

Because Operations is capable of designing and adding alarms, they should also have authority to modify or remove them. Operations can be given the responsibility for managing and staffing an alarm management effort or for overseeing a third-party resource. Many of our clients are even going so far as downplaying data analysis to allow members of the operating team to identify "bad actor" alarms.

What are your thoughts about handing the alarm management car keys to Operations? Good idea? Been there done that? Give us your feedback at www.alarmmanagement.com.